A grieving Colombian family has filed a formal complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, a Washington, DC-based body. They allege that Alejandro Carranza Medina, a Colombian citizen, was unlawfully killed in a US airstrike on September 15.
This filing marks the first official challenge to the Trump administration’s airstrike strategy against suspected drug-smuggling vessels, a program the White House says rests on a novel interpretation of the law.
The IACHR operates under the umbrella of the Organization of American States and is tasked with promoting and protecting human rights in the Western Hemisphere. The United States is a member state. In March, a statement from the Trump administration’s State Department asserted strong support for the IACHR and its independence, framing the Commission’s autonomy as a foundational element of U.S. human rights policy in the region.
The petition is submitted by Dan Kovalik, a Pittsburgh-based human rights attorney. The filing asserts that on September 15, 2025, the United States military targeted and bombed the boat carrying Alejandro Andres Carranza Medina off the coast of Colombia, resulting in his death.
Kovalik identifies Pete Hegseth as the architect of the operation, citing public remarks. The document argues that Hegseth ordered strikes on boats like Carranza Medina’s without confirming the identities of those aboard, effectively constituting extrajudicial killings. The petition also asserts that President Donald Trump has endorsed these actions.
A White House spokesperson, Anna Kelly, did not directly address the complaint or Carranza Medina’s death. Instead, she accused the media of shielding foreign drug traffickers involved in smuggling dangerous narcotics intended to harm Americans.
Carranza, aged 42, is believed to have died in the campaign’s second wave of strikes on alleged drug vessels. The administration has publicly acknowledged 21 strikes targeting such boats. Carranza’s family says he was a fisherman who regularly ventured out in search of marlin and tuna.
On the day of the strike, Trump announced via Truth Social that US military forces had conducted a second kinetic strike against identified drug trafficking cartels and narcoterrorists in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility, attaching an unclassified video showing a small boat before it was hit. The president later characterized the crew as Venezuelan, though the Colombian government clarified they were Colombian.
Kovalik noted that pursuing redress through the IACHR could be a meaningful first step to compel the United States to halt these boat-targeting operations and to seek accountability for the killing of Carranza Medina.
If you have information relevant to this story, the Guardian provides secure avenues for tips, including encrypted messaging through the Guardian app and a SecureDrop system for anonymous submissions. Readers are encouraged to share credible information while protecting their privacy.
Controversial angle to consider: how should modern military interventions against suspected illicit networks be evaluated in terms of legality, civilian risk, and transparency? Do the procedures and accountability channels in place adequately address potential misidentifications or civilian harm? Share your thoughts in the comments.
